As these things often do, it started out quite simple. I'd read about Charlieplexing before on Hackaday, and it seemed like a great way of doing a little array. I figured I could just about get away with a 5x6 array on a board measuring 18x23mm... small enough to make into a ring. It wouldn't need anything fancy... an 8-bit micro would be plenty enough to drive and display a few scrolling messages.
The schematic in progress ended up like this...
Using a QFN16 package let everything fit on neatly, with IO to spare to connect to other doodads when I actually figured out how to do it. Processor was to be a PIC16F684. There's quite a few pics of similar sizes, so I liked the idea of doing one with touch sensing.
The LTC3525 DC/DC converter went on the underside. Power source was to be a supercapacitor, which was going to allow for very fast charging... a few amps for a few seconds, and you're done - excellent! There are many companies who make these things, but after doing some research, the best I could find in small form factors were from an australian company called Cap XX. They do them in prismatic packaging which allows for a very thin form factor... ideal for a design like this!
I bought a few and did some experiments...
This here is a series-stacked pair of HA130 cells, which are charged to around 5V with a very low power levelling opamp circuit, using the MAX4470... this works out to be much more efficient in terms of energy consumption than a lower resistance balancing ladder. That small gap between the two bits of copper on the right hand side is a crude (but effective) resistive touch switch. This controls a PMOS FET (with some gate protection circuitry) which allows current to pass to the LED.
While it worked pretty well on the bench, I noticed that the supercapacitors were discharging much faster than my simulations had anticipated. After some discussion with CAP-XX, it turned out that self-discharge rate and leakage current are treated as two very different things... only the latter is specified. The rate was so high that it wouldn't stay at a useful level for more than a few hours.... gah. And paralleling cells instead doesn't help the standby current one jot as the discharge rate will be high on both cells. A boost converter would allow a longer standby but the on time would be very short near the end.
Ah well. It didn't look like this was going to be practical. The thing was, if I started looking again at a conventional battery, pretty much anything would be overkill for just a few lights. Hmm. Maybe I could look at doing something a bit more complicated...
No comments:
Post a Comment